![]() ![]() Instead of adopting brushed metal we adopted the unified title-and-toolbar look. So we set out to remove stripes and margins. The unified title-and-toolbar look is the new platinum.ĥ. When we were working on NetNewsWire 2.0, we identified some trends in OS X UI design, which could be expressed breezily as:Ĥ. #Flysketch mac updateThe first app to update would be the Finder. Iâd even put up with the ouch-I-got-a-nasty-pixel-cut corners if it meant ditching brushed metal. updated immediately to adopt the iTunes window. I would so love to see Automator, iCal, etc. (Which is a reasonable choice to want to have, given that it matters how the window content is framed.) If this release of iTunes is a step down a path like the above, then thatâs very coolâweâd have a more consistent experience (and thus more aesthetically pleasing) with still the ability to choose between light and dark windows. The unified window look evolves over time, rather than coming up with completely new looks. We have, then, the unified title-and-toolbar look with two varieties: the lighter version as seen in System Preferences, Mail, and Dictionary, and the darker version as seen in iTunes.ģ. Brushed metal and pin-striped Aqua go away. Itâs not just that brushed metal already, incredibly, looks dated, itâs that to me brushed metal feels ponderous and leaden. I donât like the sharp corners around the window.īut I love that itâs not brushed metal anymore. I like most things about the new iTunes 5 look, but not everything. Porst filed a bug about nicknames in Mail.įor more, see the applebugfriday page on. (Iâll definitely be looking at the new crash-report helper from Unsanity.)ĭan Wood filed 4247645 about the new iTunes UI and reviews some previous reports. So the best thing is to get the crashing bugs out of the system.ĭrunkenbatman: Spotlight on Spotlight, Part 01 of ∞ and Of Smart Crash Reports. There is no real answer to that question. But how would the average user be able to tell the difference? (Itâs important because your reputation is at stake.) How would they know differently? Your app crashed, therefore itâs a bug in your app, right?Įxcept when itâs not, except when itâs a bug in the system. When your app crashes due to a bug in the system, your users think itâs your bug. Itâs the first principle of craftsmanship: donât build things that fall down. The thing about crashing bugs like this is that any developer worth anything takes great pride in writing stable applications. ![]() (Remember the Safari Image of Doom? You could call this the CoreFoundation XML File of Doom.) ![]() (The feed is ShiftJISCrash.xml, at the top level of the project folder.) Inside the appâs bundle is a Shift_JIS-encoded feed that crashes whenever CFXMLTreeCreateFromData is called. To reproduce the crash, launch the application (at ShiftJISCrash/build/Release/ShiftJISCrash.app), then click the âParse Shift_JIS Fileâ button. #Flysketch mac downloadI even created a small project to demonstrate it: download ShiftJISCrash.zip. My Apple bug of the week is # 4251116, a crash in the CoreFoundation XML parser that often happens with Shift_JIS-encoded feeds. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |